Projects Lab, Chemical Engineering, University of Utah

Rubric for CH EN 4905

Technical Presentation

← View CH EN 4905 Rubric
 

50% - Score from the Professor.
12% - Introduction: Title, attention getter, credibility, clearly stated central idea, established interest and credibility, identifies purpose, citations given for introductory material.
12% - Structure and Organization: Well developed main points, persuasive supporting material, the ideas were ordered logically, kept within the time constraints.
25% - Technical Content: Theory introduced is sound and correctly applied to data. The detail in the theory is sufficient to lead an audience familiar with basic chemical engineering concepts to understand the more specialized concepts presented. The relevance of the data presented to the central idea is evident. Data are displayed properly and clearly, with indications of confidence intervals where appropriate.
12% - Conclusion: Described the possible the future of this topic, restated central idea and left audience with a residual message
12% - Visual Aids: Appropriate text size, font, and color, general visual appeal, presentation of visual aids, citations given for images.
12% - Delivery: Appropriate eye contact, movement, rate of speech, volume, enthusiasm, confidence, lack of verbal fillers.
15% - Overall Quality: Includes impressions of persuasiveness and audience adaptation.
50% - Score from CLEAR.
12% - Introduction: Title, attention getter, credibility, clearly stated central idea, established interest and credibility, identifies purpose, citations given for introductory material.
12% - Structure and Organization: Well developed main points, persuasive supporting material, the ideas were ordered logically, kept within the time constraints.
25% - Technical Content: Theory introduced is sound and correctly applied to data. The detail in the theory is sufficient to lead an audience familiar with basic chemical engineering concepts to understand the more specialized concepts presented. The relevance of the data presented to the central idea is evident. Data are displayed properly and clearly, with indications of confidence intervals where appropriate.
12% - Conclusion: Described the possible the future of this topic, restated central idea and left audience with a residual message
12% - Visual Aids: Appropriate text size, font, and color, general visual appeal, presentation of visual aids, citations given for images.
12% - Delivery: Appropriate eye contact, movement, rate of speech, volume, enthusiasm, confidence, lack of verbal fillers.
15% - Overall Quality: Includes impressions of persuasiveness and audience adaptation.
0% - Score from peers
12% - Introduction: Title, attention getter, credibility, clearly stated central idea, established interest and credibility, identifies purpose, citations given for introductory material.
12% - Structure and Organization: Well developed main points, persuasive supporting material, the ideas were ordered logically, kept within the time constraints.
25% - Technical Content: Theory introduced is sound and correctly applied to data. The detail in the theory is sufficient to lead an audience familiar with basic chemical engineering concepts to understand the more specialized concepts presented. The relevance of the data presented to the central idea is evident. Data are displayed properly and clearly, with indications of confidence intervals where appropriate.
12% - Conclusion: Described the possible the future of this topic, restated central idea and left audience with a residual message
12% - Visual Aids: Appropriate text size, font, and color, general visual appeal, presentation of visual aids, citations given for images.
12% - Delivery: Appropriate eye contact, movement, rate of speech, volume, enthusiasm, confidence, lack of verbal fillers.
15% - Overall Quality: Includes impressions of persuasiveness and audience adaptation.

 

line

 

Primary Rubrics for This Semester: